Service use ‐ not measured · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Global state: No clinically important response (as defined by the original studies) · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether COMPARISON 5. ARIPIPRAZOLE changes global state: No clinically significant response compared with OLANZAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE changes leaving the study early ‐ Any reason compared with CLOZAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mental state: as · patients with schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early · patients with schizophrenia
COMPARISON 5. ARIPIPRAZOLE may leads to higher leaving the study early compared with OLANZAPINE (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life: as · patients with schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Weight gain · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether COMPARISON 5. ARIPIPRAZOLE changes adverse effects: weight gain compared with OLANZAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
General functioning ‐ not measured · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Service use ‐ not measured · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · patients with schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects: any observed extrapyramidal symptoms ‐ short term (up to 6 months) · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE changes adverse effects: extrapyramidal effects compared with CLOZAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
General functioning ‐ not measured · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Service use ‐ not measured · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Global state: No clinically significant response (as defined by the original studies) · patients with schizophrenia
COMPARISON 2. ARIPIPRAZOLE showed no clear difference in global state: No clinically significant response (as defined by… compared with QUETIAPINE (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mental state: 2. Positive symptoms ‐ average endpoint score PANSS positive subscore · patients with schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical response: no clinically significant response in mental state · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Weight gain · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Clinical response: mean score/change in global state · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mental state · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Acceptability of treatment ‐ leaving the study early · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether CLOZAPINE + ARIPIPRAZOLE changes leaving the study early: acceptability of treatment ‐ as measured by… compared with CLOZAPINE + HALOPERIDOL (Cipriani 2013) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review