Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

737 questions · 750 findings · 76 reviews

No studies found 182 · 24.3%GRADE not reported 95 · 12.7%Very low 229 · 30.5%Low 128 · 17.1%Moderate 76 · 10.1%High 40 · 5.3%

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome: improvement in symptoms (respiratory distress/dyspnoea) · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome: improvement in symptoms (voice quality) · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome: improvement in quality of life · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome: recurrence‐free interval · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Reduction in mortality · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Reduction in number and/or frequency of surgical interventions and/or time until first relapse requiring surgery · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Reduction in number and/or duration of hospital stay(s) · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Reduction in volume of disease, assessed endoscopically · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
1 finding from 1 review

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Side effects · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
1 finding from 1 review · compare the 2 reviews

Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers vs No screening

Oral cancer mortality (disease-specific) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…

Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers showed no clear difference in oral cancer mortality (disease-specific) compared with no screening (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Gingivitis · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing may leads to lower gingivitis (bleeding and gingival indices; standardised across… compared with flossing plus toothbrushing (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review · compare the 2 reviews

Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers vs No screening

Costs · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
1 finding from 1 review
  • Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
    9 years (three cycles)
    The costs associated with the screening programme were reported after three cycles (nine years) (Subramanian 2009) (Additional Table 8). The benefit produced by a screen was 269.31 life-years saved per 100,000 for all…
    1 study
    GRADE not reported