evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

643 questions · 693 findings · 156 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 177 · 25.5%GRADE not reported 100 · 14.4%Very low 144 · 20.8%Low 139 · 20.1%Moderate 106 · 15.3%High 27 · 3.9%

Supervised exercise therapy following vascular intervention vs vascular intervention alone

All‐cause mortality · people with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease§

It is very uncertain whether supervised exercise therapy following vascular intervention changes mortality compared with vascular intervention alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Supervised exercise therapy following vascular intervention vs vascular intervention alone

Reintervention · people with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease§

It is very uncertain whether supervised exercise therapy following vascular intervention changes reintervention compared with vascular intervention alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Survival · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Quality of life: total score · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Quality of life: CFQ‐R respiratory domain: absolute change from baseline · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

FEV1 % predicted: relative change from baseline · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

FEV1 % predicted: absolute change from baseline · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Adverse events ‐ treatment emergent · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor showed no clear difference in adverse events: number of participants with treatment‐emergent… compared with control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ triple therapy: elexacaftor‐tezacaftor‐ivacaftor vs control (ivacaftor alone or tezacaftor plus ivacaftor)

Time to first pulmonary exacerbation · adults and children aged 12 years and over with cystic fibrosis and either F508del/gating variant or F508del/residual function genotype

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review