Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,782 questions · 1,852 findings · 128 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 557 · 30.1%GRADE not reported 53 · 2.9%Very low 446 · 24.1%Low 476 · 25.7%Moderate 255 · 13.8%High 65 · 3.5%

Mobile clinical decision‐support system vs usual care

Provider acceptability and satisfaction (Proportion of participants who reported using the digital intervention) · healthcare providers using clinical decision‐support tools and patients receiving care from such providers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 19: social exclusion. Some parents, predominantly from LMICs, were less accepting of childhood vaccination due to their experiences of social exclusion. Social exclusion may involve economic disadvantage, residential segregation, a lack of... · groups. Numerous parents characterised infants and young children as weak and vulnerable, and in need of protection against multiple…
1 finding from 1 review

Printed educational material vs no intervention

Changes in professional practice (continuous) · Healthcare professionals
3 findings from 1 review

Patient‐initiated appointment systems vs consultant‐led appointment systems

Anxiety · adults with a chronic or recurrent condition

Patient‐initiated appointment systems showed no clear difference in patient outcomes: anxiety (HADS)a 12–24 months compared with consultant‐led appointment systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐initiated appointment systems vs consultant‐led appointment systems

Patient outcomes: depression (HADS)a 9–24 months · adults with a chronic or recurrent condition

Patient‐initiated appointment systems showed no clear difference in patient outcomes: depression (HADS)a 9–24 months compared with consultant‐led appointment systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐initiated appointment systems vs consultant‐led appointment systems

QoL · adults with a chronic or recurrent condition

Patient‐initiated appointment systems showed no clear difference in patient outcomes: quality of life (different scales used across… compared with consultant‐led appointment systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐initiated appointment systems vs consultant‐led appointment systems

Service utilisation · adults with a chronic or recurrent condition

Patient‐initiated appointment systems may leads to higher service utilisation (contacts) compared with consultant‐led appointment systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review