Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

958 questions · 991 findings · 123 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 177 · 17.9%GRADE not reported 25 · 2.5%Very low 230 · 23.2%Low 321 · 32.4%Moderate 185 · 18.7%High 53 · 5.3%

Pentoxifylline with antibiotics (any dose or duration) vs immunoglobulin M‐enriched intravenous immunoglobulin with antibiotics

All‐cause mortality during hospital stay · neonates with sepsis

It is very uncertain whether pentoxifylline with antibiotics (any dose or duration) changes all‐cause mortality during hospital stay compared with immunoglobulin M‐enriched intravenous immunoglobulin with antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pentoxifylline with antibiotics (any dose or duration) vs immunoglobulin M‐enriched intravenous immunoglobulin with antibiotics

Necrotising enterocolitis · neonates with sepsis

It is very uncertain whether pentoxifylline with antibiotics (any dose or duration) changes necrotising enterocolitis, any Bell stage compared with immunoglobulin M‐enriched intravenous immunoglobulin with antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pentoxifylline with antibiotics (any dose or duration) vs pentoxifylline with antibiotics and immunoglobulin M‐enriched intravenous immunoglobulin

All‐cause mortality during hospital stay · neonates with sepsis

It is very uncertain whether pentoxifylline with antibiotics (any dose or duration) changes all‐cause mortality during hospital stay compared with pentoxifylline with antibiotics and immunoglobulin M‐enriched… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

CAS improvement (decrease) by 2 or more points · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

Summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab showed no clear difference in CAS improvement (decrease) by 2 or more points compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

NOSPECS improvement (decrease) by 2 classes or more · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes NOSPECS improvement (decrease) by 2 or more classes compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

Proptosis improvement (decrease) by 2 mm or more · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes proptosis improvement (decrease) by 2 mm or more compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

Palpebral aperture improvement (decrease) by 3 mm or more · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes palpebral aperture improvement (decrease) by 3 mm or more compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

Motility improvement (increase) by 1 class or more · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes motility improvement (increase) by 1 class or more compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review