Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

880 questions · 912 findings · 126 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 143 · 15.7%GRADE not reported 38 · 4.2%Very low 250 · 27.4%Low 253 · 27.7%Moderate 168 · 18.4%High 60 · 6.6%

Betamethasone vs usual care

Respiratory distress syndrome · women undergoing planned elective caesarean section at 37 weeks' gestation and beyond for singleton pregnancy

Effect of antenatal corticosteroids (betamethasone) showed no clear difference in respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared with usual care prior to planned caesarean at term on maternal and… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Betamethasone vs usual care

Transient tachypnoea of the neonate (TTN) · women undergoing planned elective caesarean section at 37 weeks' gestation and beyond for singleton pregnancy

Effect of antenatal corticosteroids (betamethasone) showed no clear difference in transient tachypnoea of the neonate (TTN) compared with usual care prior to planned caesarean at term on maternal and… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Betamethasone vs usual care

Admission to neonatal special care (all levels) for respiratory morbidity · women undergoing planned elective caesarean section at 37 weeks' gestation and beyond for singleton pregnancy

Effect of antenatal corticosteroids (betamethasone) probably leads to lower admission to neonatal special care (all levels) for respiratory… compared with usual care prior to planned caesarean at term on maternal and… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Betamethasone vs usual care

Need for mechanical ventilation · women undergoing planned elective caesarean section at 37 weeks' gestation and beyond for singleton pregnancy

It is very uncertain whether effect of antenatal corticosteroids (betamethasone) changes need for mechanical ventilation compared with usual care prior to planned caesarean at term on maternal and… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs a single‐incision sling (mini‐sling)

Number of continent (dry) women (any definition) in the medium term (1 to 5 years) · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether traditional suburethral sling operation changes number of continent (dry) women (any definition) in the medium term… compared with a single‐incision sling (mini‐sling) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs a single‐incision sling (mini‐sling)

Perioperative surgical complications ‐ bladder perforation · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether traditional suburethral sling operation changes perioperative surgical complications ‐ bladder perforation compared with a single‐incision sling (mini‐sling) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Procedures: doffing with double gloves vs doffing with single gloves

Contamination: virus detected ‐ All body parts · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ all body parts compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Procedures: doffing with double gloves vs doffing with single gloves

Contamination: virus detected ‐ face · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ face compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Procedures: doffing with double gloves vs doffing with single gloves

Contamination: virus detected ‐ shirt · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ shirt compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Procedures: doffing with double gloves vs doffing with single gloves

Contamination: virus detected ‐ pants · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes contamination: virus detected ‐ pants compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Procedures: doffing with double gloves vs doffing with single gloves

Compliance with guidance ‐ Noncompliance: any error · healthcare workers

It is very uncertain whether procedures: doffing with double gloves changes non‐compliance: any error compared with doffing with single gloves (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review