Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,325 questions in 34 reviews · Oral medicine and oral cancer

current versions
No studies 164 · 12.4%Ungraded 841 · 63.5%Very low 209 · 15.8%Low 72 · 5.4%Moderate 38 · 2.9%High 1 · 0.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Two-phase oil-water mouthrinse (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride) vs Essential oils mouthrinse (Listerine)
Peak volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 6 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Kozlovsky 1996: peak VSC (ppb). Two-phase oil-water (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride): 94 (SD 36) at baseline to 56 (SD 10) at week 6 (less than 40% reduction); Control essential oils (Listerine): 79 (SD 40) to 56 (SD…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Direct costs (medication, hospital bed days) · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
No data available in either included study.NRNo studies
Pericarp extract of Garcinia mangostana L mouthrinse (herbal) vs Placebo
Halimeter-assessed volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 15 days
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Rassameemasmaung 2007: halimeter-assessed VSC (ppb). Herbal (Garcinia mangostana L): 248.35 (SD 172.30) at baseline to 100.54 (SD 69.37) at day 15 (59.68% reduction, P < 0.05); Placebo: 237.45 (SD 114.15) to 176.83 (SD…1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
0.05% chlorhexidine + 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride + 0.14% zinc lactate mouthrinse vs Placebo
Organoleptic assessment of halitosis (mean change from baseline) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 2 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Winkel 2003 (2-week trial): mean change (SD) in organoleptic score (scale 0 to 5). 0.05% chlorhexidine + 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride + 0.14% zinc lactate: -1.13 (1.1), baseline 2.8 (0.5) to 1.5 (1.0) at day 14, P <…1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)
Self-esteem (validated questionnaires) · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic…
Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate (2008) · Cochrane
No data were available for this patient-reported outcome in the single included trial.0 studiesNo studies
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)
Instrumental assessment: velopharyngeal complete closure and gap size (videonasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy) · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic… · 3 months post-operatively
Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate (2008) · Cochrane
Complete closure occurred in 32 (86%) of the participants in group 1 (MIPP) and in 31 (89%) in group 2, P > 0.05. After eliminating the nine patients with residual velopharyngeal insufficiency, the post-operative gap…1 study · 72 participantsUngraded
0.05% chlorhexidine + 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride + 0.14% zinc lactate mouthrinse vs Placebo
Peak volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) (mean change from baseline) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 2 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Winkel 2003: mean change (SD) in peak VSC (ppb). Mouthrinse: -120 (92), baseline 292 (141) to 172 (104) at day 14, P < 0.005; Placebo: 8 (145), baseline 352 (161) to 360 (254). The mouthrinse caused a significantly…1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Cetylpyridinium chloride + essential oils + chlorine dioxide + zinc mouthrinse (Breath Rx) vs Placebo
Organoleptic assessment of halitosis (mean change from baseline) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 4 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Borden 2002: mean change in organoleptic score (scale 0 to 5). Breath Rx (cetylpyridinium chloride + essential oils + chlorine dioxide + zinc): -0.52 at 2 weeks, -0.41 at 4 weeks; Placebo: 0.23 at 2 weeks, 0.16 at 4…1 studyUngraded
Chlorine dioxide + zinc mouthrinse (Oxygene) vs Placebo
Organoleptic assessment of halitosis (mean change from baseline) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 4 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Borden 2002: mean change in organoleptic score (scale 0 to 5). Oxygene (chlorine dioxide + zinc): 0 at 2 weeks, 0.06 at 4 weeks; Placebo: 0.23 at 2 weeks, 0.16 at 4 weeks. Oxygene did not appear to reduce organoleptic…1 studyUngraded
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Number of individuals with eating difficulties (8 days after administration); duration of eating difficulties · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis) · 8 days after administration
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
RR 0.14 [0.03, 0.58]1 study · 72 participantsUngraded
0.05% chlorhexidine + 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride + 0.14% zinc lactate mouthrinse vs Placebo
Adverse events (tongue and tooth staining) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 2 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Winkel 2003: significantly more tongue staining (P < 0.001) and tooth staining (P < 0.002) were noted with the chlorhexidine + cetylpyridinium chloride + zinc lactate mouthrinse than with placebo.1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Zinc chloride + sodium chlorite mouthrinse (TriOral) vs Control mouthrinse (containing neither zinc chloride nor sodium chlorite)
Halimeter-assessed volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 4 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Codipilly 2004: precise data could not be extracted (results presented as graph plots). Reported VSC reductions from baseline for zinc chloride + sodium chlorite (TriOral): 55% (P < 0.01) at 2 weeks and 60% (P < 0.01)…1 studyUngraded
Essential oils mouthrinse (Listerine) vs Placebo
Organoleptic assessment of halitosis (mean change from baseline) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 4 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Borden 2002: mean change in organoleptic score (scale 0 to 5). Essential oils (Listerine): 0.02 at 2 weeks, 0 at 4 weeks; Placebo: 0.23 at 2 weeks, 0.16 at 4 weeks. Listerine did not reduce organoleptic scores. No…1 studyUngraded
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Number of individuals with drinking difficulties (8 days after administration); duration of drinking difficulties · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis) · 8 days after administration
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
RR 0.11 [0.01, 0.83]1 study · 72 participantsUngraded
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Number of individuals admitted to hospital after administration · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis) · After administration
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
RR 0.14 [0.01, 2.67]1 study · 72 participantsUngraded
Essential oils mouthrinse (Listerine) vs Placebo
Halimeter-assessed volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) (mean change from baseline) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 4 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Borden 2002: mean change in halimeter-assessed VSC (ppb). Essential oils (Listerine): -43.22 at 2 weeks (48.54% reduction), -68.90 at 4 weeks (77.39% reduction); Placebo: -39.86 at 2 weeks (45.25%), -36.77 at 4 weeks…1 studyUngraded
Zinc chloride + sodium chlorite mouthrinse (TriOral) vs Control mouthrinse (containing neither zinc chloride nor sodium chlorite)
Organoleptic assessment (indirect surrogate salivary organoleptic score) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 4 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Codipilly 2004: only indirect surrogate salivary organoleptic scores were reported (not organoleptic breath scores); no accurate deductions could be made from the reported values.1 studyUngraded
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Fever (duration; time to return to normal temperature) · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
Amir 1997b: fever disappeared significantly earlier with acyclovir (median 1 day) than placebo (median 3 days); difference in median (95% CI): From 72: 1 (0.0 to 2.0); From 61: 2 (0.8 to 3.2); reported as median, not…2 studiesUngraded
Zinc chloride without sodium chlorite mouthrinse (Breath Rx containing cetylpyridinium chloride) vs Control mouthrinse (containing neither zinc chloride nor sodium chlorite)
Halimeter-assessed volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 4 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane
Codipilly 2004: reported VSC reduction from baseline for zinc chloride minus sodium chlorite (Breath Rx containing cetylpyridinium chloride): 38% (P < 0.05) at 2 weeks, versus a control containing neither zinc chloride…1 studyUngraded
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Patient or parental satisfaction (tolerance and acceptability of drug) · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
Amir 1997b: no data available. Ducoulombier 1988: tolerance and acceptability of the drug was described as satisfactory, but it was unclear how this was assessed by the trialists.1 studyUngraded
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)
Adverse effect: failure of muscle fusion in the region of the cleft after surgery · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic…
Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate (2008) · Cochrane
There were no reports of failure of muscle fusion after surgery.1 study · 72 participantsUngraded
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)
Adverse effect: unacceptable nasal resonance after repair · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic…
Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate (2008) · Cochrane
The trial report provided no information on this adverse event; no information on adverse events or serious complications was reported.0 studiesNo studies
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Adverse effects · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
Amir 1997b: two children in each group (2 vs 2) had mild gastrointestinal symptoms that resolved spontaneously after 24 to 48 hours without a change in study treatment. Ducoulombier 1988: no significant adverse effects…2 studiesUngraded
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)
Adverse effect: obstructive sleep apnoea or airway compromise · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic…
Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate (2008) · Cochrane
The investigators stated that none of the participants reported obstructive sleep apnoea after the interventions.1 study · 72 participantsUngraded
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)
Perceptual speech assessment: residual post-operative velopharyngeal insufficiency · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic… · 3 months post-operatively
Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate (2008) · Cochrane
Five (14%) of the participants in group 1 (MIPP) and four (11%) in group 2 had residual post-operative velopharyngeal insufficiency, P > 0.05. The report provided no details on post-operative speech assessment other…1 study · 72 participantsUngraded
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Quality of life (assessed by a validated questionnaire) · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
No data were available in either included study (Amir 1997b; Ducoulombier 1988).NRNo studies
Systemic oral acyclovir vs Placebo or no treatment
Pain/discomfort (time to resolution of pain) · Children and young adults under 25 years with primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (with or without herpes labialis)
Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (2008) · Cochrane
Amir 1997b: no data available. Ducoulombier 1988: time to resolution of pain, acyclovir (1 day=1, 2 days=1, 3 days=3, 4 days=3, 5 days=1, persistent=0) vs placebo (1 day=0, 2 days=0, 3 days=1, 4 days=2, 5 days=4,…1 study · 18 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs partially absorbed from GI tract (miconazole, clotrimazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Systemic fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 2.27 [0.23, 22.56]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract vs Placebo or no treatment
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.47, 1.01]8 studies · 382 participantsUngraded
Amphotericin B vs Placebo or no treatment
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.46 [0.18, 1.23]2 studies · 48 participantsUngraded
Itraconazole vs Fluconazole
Empirical antifungal treatment · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.05, 5.43]1 study · 202 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Systemic fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.37, 1.14]6 studies · 1041 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Relief of dysphagia · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
No trial reported this planned secondary outcome for any comparison in this reviewNRNo studies
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Empirical antifungal treatment · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.73, 0.99]2 studies · 465 participantsUngraded
Chlorhexidine vs Placebo or no treatment
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.59 [0.19, 1.83]3 studies · 115 participantsUngraded
Itraconazole vs Fluconazole
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
1 study (Huijgens 1999); no evidence of a difference; single-study total not pooled1 studyUngraded
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Cost of oral care · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
No trial reported this planned secondary outcome for any comparison in this reviewNRNo studies
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Good compliance · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.89, 1.27]2 studies · 615 participantsUngraded
Norfloxacin plus amphotericin B vs Amphotericin B
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.15, 1.0]1 study · 106 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Duration of stay in hospital (days) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
No trial reported this planned secondary outcome for any comparison in this reviewNRNo studies
Antifungal drugs partially absorbed from GI tract (miconazole, clotrimazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Toxicity (adverse events probably due to drug) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
2 studies, 60 participants; effect not estimable (no events reported)2 studies · 60 participantsUngraded
Chlorhexidine vs Chlorhexidine plus nystatin
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 1.62 [0.64, 4.1]1 study · 52 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Death associated with fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 1.44 [0.14, 15.43]3 studies · 718 participantsUngraded
Itraconazole vs Fluconazole
Systemic fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 1.0 [0.26, 3.89]1 study · 202 participantsUngraded
Ketoconazole 400 mg vs Ketoconazole 200 mg
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
1 study (Scrimgeour 1985); no patient experienced oral candidiasis, not estimable1 studyUngraded
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Patient quality of life · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
No trial reported this planned secondary outcome for any comparison in this reviewNRNo studies
Thymostimulin vs Placebo or no treatment
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.4 [0.12, 1.32]1 study · 35 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract vs Antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract
Empirical antifungal treatment · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.68, 1.16]4 studies · 1031 participantsUngraded
Itraconazole vs Fluconazole
Toxicity (adverse events probably due to drug) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
2 studies, 232 participants; effect not estimable2 studies · 232 participantsUngraded
Norfloxacin plus amphotericin B vs Amphotericin B
Systemic fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.2, 2.23]1 study · 106 participantsUngraded