The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Summary of findings: tubal ring may leads to lower major morbidity: total compared with electrocoagulation (low certainty).
Summary of findings: tubal ring showed no clear difference in minor morbidity: total compared with electrocoagulation (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: tubal ring showed no clear difference in technical failures: total compared with electrocoagulation (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: tubal ring may leads to higher complaints ‐ postoperative pain (24 hours) compared with electrocoagulation (low certainty).
Summary of findings: tubal ring showed no clear difference in complaints ‐ persistent pain at compared with electrocoagulation (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: Hulka clip showed no clear difference in minor morbidity: total compared with filshie clip (low certainty).
Summary of findings: Hulka clip showed no clear difference in minor morbidity: procedure‐related injuries compared with filshie clip (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: Hulka clip showed no clear difference in technical failures compared with filshie clip (low certainty).
Summary of findings: Hulka clip showed no clear difference in failure rate: total (12 months) compared with filshie clip (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: Hulka clip showed no clear difference in complaints: postoperative pain (24 hours) compared with filshie clip (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Open showed no clear difference in early graft loss compared with laparoscopic (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Open showed no clear difference in delayed graft function compared with laparoscopic (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Open showed no clear difference in acute rejection compared with laparoscopic (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Open showed no clear difference in ureteric complications compared with laparoscopic (low certainty).