Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

707 questions · 732 findings · 77 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 168 · 23%GRADE not reported 85 · 11.6%Very low 292 · 39.9%Low 149 · 20.4%Moderate 35 · 4.8%High 3 · 0.4%

GROUP PSYCHOSOCIAL THERAPY (GPT) + TAU vs TAU

Adverse events: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

GROUP PSYCHOSOCIAL THERAPY (GPT) + TAU vs TAU

Service Use: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

GROUP PSYCHOSOCIAL THERAPY (GPT) + TAU vs TAU

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether GROUP PSYCHOSOCIAL THERAPY (GPT) + TAU changes leaving the study early: For any reason compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.43 [0.15, 1.28]
1 study · 56 participants
Very low

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Global State: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
Very low

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Cognitive functioning: Attaining normal cognitive functioning ‐ Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Global functioning: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Adverse events: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Very low

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Service Use: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU showed no clear difference in leaving the study early: For any reason compared with HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.71 [0.25, 2]
1 study · 60 participants
Low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Global state: average score: long term (+ 26 weeks) Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Scale from: 0 to 100. · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Cognitive function · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Global functioning: Clinically important change ‐ as defined by each of the studies · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Adverse effect: clinically important adverse effect of intervention ‐ as defined by individual studies · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Hospital admissions · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Global state: Average endpoint score HoNOSCA (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Cognitive functioning: clinically important change Not attaining normal cognitive function (Memory Digit Span) · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) changes cognitive functioning: clinically important change Not attaining… compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.58 [0.37, 0.89]
1 study · 31 participants
Very low