Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,092 questions · 3,199 findings · 339 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 714 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 181 · 5.7%Very low 695 · 21.7%Low 908 · 28.4%Moderate 568 · 17.8%High 133 · 4.2%

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

All‐cause mortality · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Major bleedinge · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in major bleedinge compared with conventional anticoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent PE · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in recurrent PEa compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent VTEc · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in recurrent VTEc compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

DVTd · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in DVTd compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine)

Failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid showed no clear difference in failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine)

Withdrawals due to adverse events · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

It is very uncertain whether oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine)

Exclusion/withdrawal after entry · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid showed no clear difference in exclusion/withdrawal after entry compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review