Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,749 questions · 14,261 findings · 832 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3,655 · 25.6%GRADE not reported 2,111 · 14.8%Very low 3,646 · 25.6%Low 3,028 · 21.2%Moderate 1,501 · 10.5%High 320 · 2.2%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Very low

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Service Use: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Global state: average score: long term (+ 26 weeks) Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Scale from: 0 to 100. · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Cognitive function · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Global functioning: Clinically important change ‐ as defined by each of the studies · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)

Adverse effect: clinically important adverse effect of intervention ‐ as defined by individual studies · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Global state: Average endpoint score HoNOSCA (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Cognitive functioning: clinically important change Not attaining normal cognitive function (Memory Digit Span) · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) changes cognitive functioning: clinically important change Not attaining… compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.58 [0.37, 0.89]
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Cognitive function: average endpoint score** · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Level of functioning · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Adverse events: Clinically important change · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Hospital admissions · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL (PE) + MULTIFAMILY TREATMENT (MFT) vs NONSTRUCTURED GROUP THERAPY (NSGT, all long‐term)

Global state: Average endpoint score CGAS (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 49 participants
Very low

PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL (PE) + MULTIFAMILY TREATMENT (MFT) vs NONSTRUCTURED GROUP THERAPY (NSGT, all long‐term)

Mental State: Mean end point score PANSS ‐ (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 49 participants
Very low

PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL (PE) + MULTIFAMILY TREATMENT (MFT) vs NONSTRUCTURED GROUP THERAPY (NSGT, all long‐term)

Cognitive functioning: Attaining normal cognitive functioning ‐ Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL (PE) + MULTIFAMILY TREATMENT (MFT) vs NONSTRUCTURED GROUP THERAPY (NSGT, all long‐term)

Global functioning: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Global functioning: Average endpoint VABS Score (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Very low

PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL (PE) + MULTIFAMILY TREATMENT (MFT) vs NONSTRUCTURED GROUP THERAPY (NSGT, all long‐term)

Adverse events: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found