Intervention not reported
Any adverse events during the trial period · people with moderate to severe disease (WHO scale 4–9); all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table investigated…
The intervention showed no clear difference in any adverse events during the trial period (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Viral clearance at day 7 · people with moderate to severe disease (WHO scale 4–9); all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table investigated…
The intervention showed no clear difference in viral clearance at day 7 (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All‐cause mortality at day 28 · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality at day 28 (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Worsening of clinical status: admission to hospital or death within 28 days · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in worsening of clinical status: admission to hospital or death within… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Preparation for decision‐making
1 finding from 1 review
Decision self‐confidence: Decision self‐efficacy scale (O'Connor 1995): range 0 to 100 (none to perfect self‐efficacy) measured 12 weeks post‐intervention (McBride 2016)
1 finding from 1 review
Feeling uninformed subscale of Decisional conflict Scale (O'Connor 1995b) measured post‐consultation (Deschamps 2004)
1 finding from 1 review
Unclear values
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Feeling unsupported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Knowledge
Comparison #2: Decision coaching showed no clear difference in knowledge tests: Standardised on score from 0 to 100 (none to… compared with evidence‐based information ‐ Summary of findings (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Anxiety (adverse effect, post‐intervention)
1 finding from 1 review
Preparation for decision‐making
1 finding from 1 review
Decision self‐confidence: Decision self‐efficacy scale (O'Connor 1995): range 0 to 100 (none to perfect self‐efficacy) measured 12 weeks post‐intervention (McBride 2016)
1 finding from 1 review
Feeling uninformed subscale of Decisional conflict Scale (O'Connor 1995b) measured post‐consultation (Deschamps 2004)
It is very uncertain whether comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information changes feeling uninformed subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale (O'Connor… compared with usual care ‐ Summary of findings (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Unclear values
It is very uncertain whether comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information changes unclear values subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale (O'Connor… compared with usual care ‐ Summary of findings (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Confidence in the decision made
1 finding from 1 review
Feeling unsupported
It is very uncertain whether comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information changes feeling unsupported subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale (O'Connor… compared with usual care ‐ Summary of findings (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge
1 finding from 1 review
Decision regret
1 finding from 1 review
Anxiety
1 finding from 1 review