Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

535 questions · 545 findings · 129 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 131 · 24%GRADE not reported 30 · 5.5%Very low 123 · 22.6%Low 136 · 25%Moderate 98 · 18%High 27 · 5%

NBI + WLC TURBT vs WLC TURBT

Time to recurrence · transurethral resection of bladder tumors in people with suspected or diagnosed non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer

NBI + WLC TURBT may leads to lower time to disease recurrence compared with WLC TURBT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NBI + WLC TURBT vs WLC TURBT

Clavien‐Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications · transurethral resection of bladder tumors in people with suspected or diagnosed non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer

NBI + WLC TURBT showed no clear difference in major adverse event (Clavien‐Dindo grade III, IV, and V) compared with WLC TURBT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NBI + WLC TURBT vs WLC TURBT

Clavien‐Dindo grade ≤ 2 complications8 · transurethral resection of bladder tumors in people with suspected or diagnosed non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer

NBI + WLC TURBT showed no clear difference in minor adverse event (Clavien‐Dindo grade I and II) compared with WLC TURBT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

IRI with fluoropyrimidines vs single agent IRI

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer

IRI with fluoropyrimidines probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (Disease progression) compared with single agent IRI (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Lymph node mets analysis ‐ N+ OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention probably leads to lower lymph node mets analysis ‐ N+ OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chemobased OS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention probably leads to lower chemobased OS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chemobased OS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in chemobased OS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chemobased DFS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy DFS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention probably leads to lower chemobased DFS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy DFS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chemobased DFS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy DFS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in chemobased DFS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy DFS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Stage OS analysis ‐ T1/2 OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in stage OS analysis ‐ T1/2 OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Stage OS analysis ‐ T3/4 OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in stage OS analysis ‐ T3/4 OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Lymph node mets analysis ‐ N‐ OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in lymph node mets analysis ‐ N‐ OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review