All‐cause mortality within 6 monthsb · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality within 6 monthsb compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Casirivimab/imdevimab leads to lower infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 by day 30 compared with placebo (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Development of clinical COVID‐19 symptoms within 30 days · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Casirivimab/imdevimab leads to lower development of clinical COVID‐19 symptoms within 30 days compared with placebo (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality by day 30 · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Casirivimab/imdevimab showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality by day 30 compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Hospital re‐admission within 30 days of discharge · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Casirivimab/imdevimab showed no clear difference in admission to hospital by day 30 compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events until data cut‐offb · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Casirivimab/imdevimab showed no clear difference in serious adverse events until data cut‐offb compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Admission to hospital within 6 monthsb · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab may leads to lower admission to hospital within 6 monthsb compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life at longest · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events: grade 1 to 2 · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Grades 3 and 4 adverse events · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events: all grades · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab showed no clear difference in adverse events: all grade within 6 monthsb compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events within 6 monthsb · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab showed no clear difference in serious adverse events within 6 monthsb compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All‐cause mortality at day 28 · people with moderate to severe disease (WHO scale 4–9); all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table investigated…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes all‐cause mortality at day 28 (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Improvement of clinical status: all initial symptoms resolved (asymptomatic) at day 14 · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in improvement of clinical status: all initial symptoms resolved… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Improvement of clinical status: time to symptom resolution · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
QoL (physical component) at up to 28 days, measured on the PROMIS Global‐10 scale and normalized to values from 16.2, low QoL, to 67.2, maximum QoL · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in qoL (physical component) at up to 28 days, measured on the PROMIS… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
QoL (mental component) at up to 28 days, measured on the PROMIS Global‐10 scale and normalized to values from 21.2, low QoL, to 67.6, maximum QoL · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in qoL (mental component) at up to 28 days, measured on the PROMIS… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events during the trial period · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in serious adverse events during the trial period (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Any adverse events during the trial period · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in any adverse events during the trial period (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Viral clearance at day 7 · all trials contributing results to the summary of findings table included people with mild disease (WHO scale 1 to 3)§
The intervention showed no clear difference in viral clearance at day 7 (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review