NB‐UVB vs placebo
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 89 participantsLow
Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in common infections measured by clinical assessment over 28 months compared with placebo (low certainty).
Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in cancer measured by clinical assessment over 28 months compared with placebo (low certainty).
Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in mortality measured by clinical assessment over 28 months compared with placebo (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Rituximab as 'switching' may leads to lower relapse measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether rituximab as 'switching' changes serious adverse events measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether rituximab as 'switching' changes common infections measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether rituximab as 'switching' changes cancer measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether rituximab as 'switching' changes mortality measured by clinical assessment over 12 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).
Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in disability worsening measured by EDSS over 24 months compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in relapse measured by clinical assessment over 24 months compared with placebo (low certainty).
Rituximab as 'first choice' showed no clear difference in serious adverse events measured by clinical assessment over 28 months compared with placebo (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with placebo/no treatment (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).
Oral misoprostol probably leads to lower oxytocin augmentation compared with placebo/no treatment (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).