Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,808 questions · 8,953 findings · 827 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 1,891 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 380 · 4.2%Very low 2,100 · 23.5%Low 2,449 · 27.4%Moderate 1,684 · 18.8%High 449 · 5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Tivozanib vs sorafenib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Tivozanib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with sorafenib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sorafenib vs pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Sorafenib probably leads to higher progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sorafenib vs pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Sorafenib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sorafenib vs pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sorafenib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs everolimus (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with everolimus (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs everolimus (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with everolimus (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sorafenib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sorafenib changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sorafenib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sorafenib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib may leads to lower serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Pazopanib showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Pazopanib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review