Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection
Function Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
4,072 questions · 4,237 findings · 447 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 946 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 257 · 6.1%Very low 1,121 · 26.5%Low 1,207 · 28.5%Moderate 568 · 13.4%High 138 · 3.3%
Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection
Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection
Recurrence · patients with trigger finger
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes recurrence compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.57 [0.21, 1.59]5 studies · 392 participantsVery low
Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection
Adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or −0 injury, dysaesthesia, and skin atrophy or hypopigmentation) · patients with trigger finger
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or −0… compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.58 [0.91, 2.75]5 studies · 392 participantsVery low
Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection
Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger
Percutaneous surgery showed no clear difference in neurovascular injury compared with steroid injection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.35 [0.04, 3.29]2 studies · 191 participantsLow
Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection
Resolution of symptoms · patients with trigger finger
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes resolution of symptoms (after 1 or more injections) compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 2.11 [0.31, 14.51]2 studies · 191 participantsVery low
Percutaneous surgery vs steroid injection
Pain intensity (0‐10cm visual analogue scale) · patients with trigger finger
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 222 participantsVery low
Laparoscopic vs diagnostic laparoscopy
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · patients with subfertility associated with endometriosis
Laparoscopic surgery may leads to higher ongoing pregnancy at 20 weeks or live birth compared with diagnostic laparoscopy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 1.64 [1.05, 2.57]2 studies · 437 participantsLow
Laparoscopic vs diagnostic laparoscopy
Pregnancy · patients with subfertility associated with endometriosis
It is very uncertain whether laparoscopic surgery changes pregnancy compared with diagnostic laparoscopy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 1.66 [1.09, 2.51]2 studies · 437 participantsVery low
Laparoscopic vs diagnostic laparoscopy
fetal loss per couple randomised · patients with subfertility associated with endometriosis
Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in fetal loss per couple randomised compared with diagnostic laparoscopy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 1.33 [0.6, 2.94]2 studies · 437 participantsLow
Laparoscopic vs diagnostic laparoscopy
operative complications · patients with subfertility associated with endometriosis
Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in operative complications compared with diagnostic laparoscopy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 2.69 [0.38, 19.3]1 study · 341 participantsLow
Hydrosurgery vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
Time to complete healing after split‐thickness skin grafting (time to complete healing) · acute partial‐thickness burns prior to skin grafting
1 finding from 1 review
- Hydrosurgical debridement versus conventional surgical debridement for acute partial‐thickness burns 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 61 participantsVery low
Hydrosurgery vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement
Post-operative infection · acute partial‐thickness burns prior to skin grafting
It is very uncertain whether hydrosurgery changes postoperative infection (number of participants with post‐operative… compared with conventional debridement (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hydrosurgical debridement versus conventional surgical debridement for acute partial‐thickness burns 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.33 [0.57, 3.11]1 study · 61 participantsVery low
Open surgery vs ERCP
All‐cause mortality · with common bile duct stones
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted8 studies · 733 participantsModerate
Open surgery vs ERCP
Total morbidity · with common bile duct stones
Open surgery showed no clear difference in total morbidity compared with ERCP (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 1.12 [0.77, 1.62]8 studies · 729 participantsModerate
Open surgery vs ERCP
Failure of procedure · with common bile duct stones
Open surgery probably leads to lower failure of procedure compared with ERCP (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 0.32 [0.21, 0.48]7 studies · 943 participantsModerate
Open surgery vs ERCP
Retained stones after primary intervention · with common bile duct stones
Open surgery probably leads to lower retained stones after primary intervention compared with ERCP (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 0.36 [0.23, 0.57]7 studies · 943 participantsModerate
Electrical stimulation plus surgery vs surgery
Cure: number of women with self‐reported continence · women with stress urinary incontinence
It is very uncertain whether electrical stimulation plus surgery changes cure: number of women with self‐reported continence compared with surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.19 [0.53, 2.67]1 study · 120 participantsVery low
Electrical stimulation plus surgery vs surgery
Improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI (cured or improved) · women with stress urinary incontinence
It is very uncertain whether electrical stimulation plus surgery changes improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI… compared with surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 5.36 [0.61, 47.36]1 study · 120 participantsVery low
Electrical stimulation plus surgery vs surgery
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence
1 finding from 1 review
- Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 120 participantsLow