Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,776 questions · 7,311 findings · 959 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,498 · 20.5%GRADE not reported 303 · 4.1%Very low 1,839 · 25.2%Low 1,991 · 27.2%Moderate 1,277 · 17.5%High 403 · 5.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Marital/relationship/partner satisfaction (secondary outcome) Not addressed · people within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Secondary outcome: all adverse events · people within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Sexual satisfaction · men (aged between 23 and 45) with premature ejaculation within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Secondary outcome: quality of life · men (aged between 23 and 45) with premature ejaculation within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Psychological well‐being (secondary outcome) Not addressed · men (aged between 23 and 45) with premature ejaculation within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Satisfaction with intervention (secondary outcome) Not addressed · men (aged between 23 and 45) with premature ejaculation within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Marital/relationship/partner satisfaction (secondary outcome) · men (aged between 23 and 45) with premature ejaculation within 3 months after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 114 participants
Very low

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Secondary outcome: all adverse events · men (aged between 23 and 45) with premature ejaculation within 3 months after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 114 participants
Very low

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Effect on later sexual function · people within 3 months after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 68 participants
Low

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Sexual satisfaction · people within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no intervention

Prevalence of undernourishment · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Food security · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Dietary diversity · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 3937 participants
Moderate

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Stunting · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 3529 participants
Low

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Wasting · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 2116 participants
Low

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Cognitive function and development · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 5383 participants
High

Income‐generation interventions vs no intervention

Prevalence of undernourishment · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Income‐generation interventions vs no intervention

Proportion of household expenditure on food · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
434 participants
GRADE not reported

Income‐generation interventions vs no intervention

Food security · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 2193 participants
Low

Income‐generation interventions vs no intervention

Dietary diversity · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 3677 participants
Low