Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,325 questions in 34 reviews · Oral medicine and oral cancer

current versions
No studies 164 · 12.4%Ungraded 841 · 63.5%Very low 209 · 15.8%Low 72 · 5.4%Moderate 38 · 2.9%High 1 · 0.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
More than 15 missing teeth vs 15 or fewer missing teeth
Oral cancer risk · People with and without more than 15 missing teeth · Missing teeth >15
Periodontitis and the risk of oral cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. (2024)
OR 1.91 [1.01, 3.62]5 studiesUngraded
Intralesional dexamethasone injections vs Placebo injections
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -2.10 [-6.77, 2.57]1 study · 25 participantsVery low
Intralesional dexamethasone injections vs Placebo injections
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -1.80 [-6.30, 2.70]1 study · 25 participantsVery low
Missing teeth / tooth loss vs Fewer or no missing teeth
Oral cancer (OC) · Adults in case-control studies of oral cancer · Not specified, Overall (all missing-teeth measures pooled)
Periodontitis and the risk of oral cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. (2024)
OR 1.20 [0.97, 1.48]6 studiesUngraded
Surgery plus Heister jaw opener vs Surgery plus wooden tongue depressors
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
Vadepally 2019 measured burning sensation on a VAS but did not fully report results, stating there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p=0.617).1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Oxitard (antioxidant) vs Aloe vera gel
Difficulty in speech (participant-reported proxy) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
OR 0.32 [0.14, 0.76]1 study · 120 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Oral cancer (OC) · Sensitivity analysis: excluding Moraes et al. [34]
Periodontitis and the risk of oral cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. (2024)
OR 2.63 [1.92, 3.62]7 studiesUngraded
Abdominal dermal fat graft vs Nasolabial flap
Adverse effects · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
Kania 2022 reported 3/30 serious adverse effects (graft failure) requiring prolonged hospital stay in the abdominal dermal fat graft group; no GRADE rating.1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Pentoxifylline vs Placebo or no active treatment
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -0.15 [-5.04, 4.74]2 studies · 136 participantsVery low
Antioxidants (lycopene, curcumin, Oxitard) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Participant satisfaction · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
The trials did not measure participant satisfaction.0 studiesNo studies
Intralesional betamethasone vs Placebo
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
Goel 2015 (3-arm: intralesional betamethasone vs lycopene vs placebo, 90 per arm): appeared to show increased interincisal distance in both intervention groups vs placebo, but only between-group differences with no…1 study · 180 participantsUngraded
Intralesional triamcinolone vs Intralesional triamcinolone plus salvianolic acid B
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -1.00 [-10.37, 8.37]1 study · 28 participantsVery low
Intralesional steroid injections vs Alternative medicinal treatments
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -0.06 [-10.64, 10.52]2 studies · 58 participantsVery low
Antioxidants (lycopene, curcumin, Oxitard) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Improvement in range of jaw movement · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
The trials did not measure range of jaw movement.0 studiesNo studies
Intralesional dexamethasone injections vs Placebo injections
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -52.00 [-62.04, -41.96]1 study · 25 participantsVery low
Surgery plus Heister jaw opener vs Surgery plus wooden tongue depressors
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD 0.92 [0.28, 1.56]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Abdominal dermal fat graft vs Nasolabial flap
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -3.60 [-5.17, -2.03]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Intralesional dexamethasone injections vs Placebo injections
Adverse effects · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
Adverse effects (any): no adverse effects reported; 25 (1); no GRADE rating.1 study · 25 participantsUngraded
Antioxidants (lycopene, curcumin, Oxitard) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Quality of life · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
The trials did not measure quality of life.0 studiesNo studies
Tongue depressor stretches (physiotherapy) vs Intralesional steroid plus hyaluronidase injections
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD 5.38 [-2.24, 13.00]1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Antioxidants (lycopene, curcumin, Oxitard) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Difficulty in mouth opening (participant-reported proxy) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
OR 0.00 [0.00, 0.02]1 study · 100 participantsUngraded
Antioxidants (lycopene, curcumin, Oxitard) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Difficulty in swallowing (participant-reported proxy) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
OR 0.24 [0.10, 0.60]2 studies · 220 participantsUngraded
Intralesional steroid injections vs Alternative medicinal treatments
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD 8.61 [-4.52, 21.74]3 studies · 98 participantsVery low
Intralesional dexamethasone injections vs Placebo injections
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -46.00 [-53.44, -38.56]1 study · 25 participantsVery low
Pentoxifylline vs Placebo or no active treatment
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD 1.80 [1.02, 2.58]1 study · 106 participantsLow
Intralesional triamcinolone vs Intralesional triamcinolone plus salvianolic acid B
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -16.30 [-28.15, -4.45]1 study · 28 participantsVery low
Hydrocortisone plus hyaluronidase (intralesional) vs Triamcinolone plus hyaluronidase (intralesional)
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
Singh 2010 (hydrocortisone+hyaluronidase 50 vs triamcinolone+hyaluronidase 50): mouth opening reported categorically (trismus) rather than as continuous data, precluding quantitative analysis; authors found no…1 study · 100 participantsUngraded
Antioxidant capsules vs Topical aloe vera gel
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
Sudarshan 2012 (topical aloe vera 10 vs antioxidant capsules 10): reported improvement in interincisal distance but no baseline data, so change could not be determined; excluded from meta-analysis.1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Pentoxifylline vs Multivitamin
Severity of oral/mucosal burning pain/sensation · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
Rajendran 2006 concluded the intervention reduced pain, but pain intensity evaluations were inadequately defined and from interview data, making mean scores difficult to interpret.1 study · 29 participantsUngraded
Pentoxifylline vs Placebo or no active treatment
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -7.00 [-28.8, 42.8]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Vasodilators (isoxsuprine, xanthinol nicotinate) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -38.79 [-52.06, -25.53]2 studies · 85 participantsVery low
Antioxidants (lycopene, curcumin, Oxitard) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Direct costs · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
The trials did not measure costs.0 studiesNo studies
Oral cancer patients (cases) vs Healthy controls
Clinical attachment loss (CAL) in OC cases vs controls · Adults in case-control studies (oral cancer patients vs healthy controls) · Not specified, CAL (clinical attachment loss)
Periodontitis and the risk of oral cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. (2024)
SMD 1.94 [0.22, 3.66]2 studiesUngraded
Oxitard (antioxidant) vs Aloe vera gel
Difficulty in swallowing (participant-reported proxy) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
OR 0.17 [0.07, 0.44]1 study · 120 participantsUngraded
Pentoxifylline vs Spirulina
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -8.00 [-14.47, -1.53]1 study · 40 participantsLow
Hydrocortisone plus hyaluronidase (intralesional) vs Placebo or no active treatment
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -4.88 [-12.87, 3.11]1 study · 12 participantsVery low
Intralesional triamcinolone vs Intralesional salvianolic acid B
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · More than 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -0.60 [-3.76, 2.56]1 study · 28 participantsVery low
Levamisole vs Antioxidant (Antoxid)
Burning sensation (VAS 0-100) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · Less than 3 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -9.10 [-16.23, -1.97]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Levamisole vs Antioxidant (Antoxid)
Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) · 3 to 6 months
Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis (2024) · Cochrane
MD -1.00 [-7.18, 5.18]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · Range 1 to 18 months (maximum time-point per study), Study design: randomized controlled trials
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
SMD -1.79 [-3.63, 0.04]3 studies · 111 participantsModerate
Surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy vs Chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy)
Disease-free survival · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer · oral cavity
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane
Disease-free survival: not reported (Iyer 2015).0 studiesNo studies
Surgery plus radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone
Locoregional recurrence · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane
Locoregional recurrence: not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · 6 months, Follow-up: 6 months
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
SMD -2.04 [-3.37, -0.70]5 studies · 253 participantsUngraded
Surgery vs Radiotherapy alone
Adverse events associated with treatment · Adults with oropharyngeal cancer
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane
Adverse events: grade 2+ treatment-related events similar (31/34 radiotherapy vs 33/34 surgery; RR 0.94, 0.83 to 1.06); more hearing loss/neutropenia/constipation/tinnitus with radiotherapy, more oral bleeding/trismus…1 study · 68 participantsVery low
Surgery plus radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone
Total mortality · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer · 3 years
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane
HR 0.24 [0.10, 0.59]1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Incidence of white spot lesions (WSLs) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · End of orthodontic treatment (varying)
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
Not meta-analyzed (heterogeneous methods; tooth-based vs patient-based incidence). 4 studies assessed WSL incidence; 3 (Albhaisi 2020 [12]; Buschang 2019 [29]; Dallel 2020 [30]) reported a lower risk of developing WSLs…4 studiesUngraded
Elective radical (comprehensive) neck dissection vs Elective selective neck dissection
Total mortality · Adults with oral cavity cancer
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane
Total mortality: 2 trials reported HR but could not be pooled (different surgical procedures); neither indicated a difference (BHNCSG 1998 HR 1.14, 0.70 to 1.86; Bier 1994 HR 0.87, 0.41 to 1.83); 252 participants (2…2 studies · 252 participantsVery low
Elective neck dissection (at time of primary tumour resection) vs Therapeutic (delayed) neck dissection
Adverse events associated with treatment · Adults with oral cavity cancer (tongue or floor of mouth) and clinically negative neck nodes
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.31 [1.11, 1.54]2 studies · 746 participantsModerate
Sentinel node biopsy (neck dissection only if biopsy positive) vs Elective neck dissection
Recurrence · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane
Recurrence: Garrel 2020 reported that the number of patients with recurrences in both arms was almost identical; unable to use the data (variable follow-up); 279 participants (1 RCT).1 study · 279 participantsVery low
Surgery plus radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone
Disease-free survival · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane
Disease-free survival: not reported.0 studiesNo studies