Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,080 questions in 109 reviews · Acute Respiratory Infections

current versions
No studies 132 · 12.2%Ungraded 90 · 8.3%Very low 169 · 15.6%Low 306 · 28.3%Moderate 287 · 26.6%High 96 · 8.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Azithromycin vs amoxicillin
Clinical cure (bacteriological per protocol analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.29 [0.11, 0.73]1 study · 482 participantsVery low
Azithromycin vs amoxicillin
Relapse (ITT analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.75 [0.55, 1.02]1 study · 673 participantsVery low
Azithromycin vs amoxicillin
Relapse (bacteriological per protocol analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.88 [0.43, 1.82]1 study · 422 participantsVery low
Azithromycin vs amoxicillin
Adverse events (ITT analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 2.67 [1.78, 3.99]1 study · 673 participantsVery low
Carbacephem vs penicillin
Resolution of symptoms post‐treatment (ITT analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.7 [0.49, 0.99]3 studies · 795 participantsLow
Carbacephem vs penicillin
Resolution of symptoms post‐treatment (evaluable participants) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.62 [0.38, 1.01]3 studies · 602 participantsLow
Carbacephem vs penicillin
Incidence of relapse (evaluable participants) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 1.27 [0.64, 2.5]3 studies · 523 participantsLow
Carbacephem vs penicillin
Adverse events (ITT analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 1.08 [0.75, 1.55]3 studies · 795 participantsLow
Cephalosporins vs penicillin
Resolution of symptoms post‐treatment (evaluable participants) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.51 [0.27, 0.97]5 studies · 1660 participantsVery low
Cephalosporins vs penicillin
Incidence of relapse (evaluable participants) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.55 [0.3, 0.99]4 studies · 1386 participantsLow
Cephalosporins vs penicillin
Adverse events (ITT analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.94 [0.27, 3.25]3 studies · 1279 participantsVery low
Macrolides vs penicillin
Resolution of symptoms post‐treatment (ITT analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 1.11 [0.92, 1.35]6 studies · 1728 participantsLow
Macrolides vs penicillin
Resolution of symptoms post‐treatment (evaluable participants) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.79 [0.57, 1.09]6 studies · 1159 participantsLow
Macrolides vs penicillin
Incidence of relapse (evaluable participants) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 1.21 [0.48, 3.03]6 studies · 802 participantsLow
Macrolides vs penicillin
Adverse events (ITT analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 1.19 [0.82, 1.73]6 studies · 1727 participantsLow
Azithromycin vs amoxicillin
Clinical cure (ITT analysis) · group A streptococcal pharyngitis
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.76 [0.55, 1.05]1 study · 673 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs immediate antibiotics
Clinical outcomes · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 2748 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Patient satisfaction: delayed (prescription collection) versus no antibiotics · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
OR 1.45 [1.08, 1.96]5 studies · 1523 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Reconsultation rate: delayed (all strategies) versus no antibiotics · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.83 [0.46, 1.52]2 studies · 584 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Adverse effects of antibiotics (diarrhoea, vomiting, rash): delayed versus no antibiotics · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 674 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs immediate antibiotics
Duration of clinical outcomes (pain, malaise, fever) · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1077 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs immediate antibiotics
Antibiotic use: delayed (all strategies) versus immediate antibiotics · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.03 [0.01, 0.07]8 studies · 2257 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs immediate antibiotics
Patient satisfaction: delayed (all strategies) versus immediate antibiotics · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
OR 0.77 [0.45, 1.29]7 studies · 1927 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs immediate antibiotics
Reconsultation rate: delayed (all strategies) versus immediate antibiotics · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
OR 1.04 [0.66, 1.63]4 studies · 972 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs immediate antibiotics
Adverse effects of antibiotics · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 1302 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Clinical outcomes: pain, malaise, fever · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 1685 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Duration of clinical outcomes (pain, malaise, fever) · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 585 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Delayed antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Antibiotic use: delayed (all strategies) versus no antibiotics · respiratory infections
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections (2023) · Cochrane
OR 2.52 [1.69, 3.75]5 studies · 1529 participantsModerate
Slow passive expiration vs control
Time to recovery/time to clinical stability Recovery defined as attaining an ABSS clinical score below 2. ( · paediatric participants between 0 and 24 months old with acute bronchiolitis
Chest physiotherapy for acute bronchiolitis in paediatric patients between 0 and 24 months old (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsLow
Slow passive expiration vs control
Change in the severity status of bronchiolitis Assessed using a variety of scales ( · paediatric participants between 0 and 24 months old with acute bronchiolitis
Chest physiotherapy for acute bronchiolitis in paediatric patients between 0 and 24 months old (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 434 participantsLow
Slow passive expiration vs control
Adverse events ( · paediatric participants between 0 and 24 months old with acute bronchiolitis
Chest physiotherapy for acute bronchiolitis in paediatric patients between 0 and 24 months old (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 565 participantsVery low
Forced expiration vs control
Time to recovery/time to clinical stability ( · paediatric participants between 0 and 24 months old with acute bronchiolitis
Chest physiotherapy for acute bronchiolitis in paediatric patients between 0 and 24 months old (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 628 participantsHigh
Forced expiration vs control
Change in the severity status of bronchiolitis Assessed using a variety of scales · paediatric participants between 0 and 24 months old with acute bronchiolitis
Chest physiotherapy for acute bronchiolitis in paediatric patients between 0 and 24 months old (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 132 participantsVery low
Forced expiration vs control
Adverse events ( · paediatric participants between 0 and 24 months old with acute bronchiolitis
Chest physiotherapy for acute bronchiolitis in paediatric patients between 0 and 24 months old (2023) · Cochrane
RR 12 studies · 599 participantsHigh
Medical/surgical masks vs no masks
Viral respiratory illness ‐ influenza/COVID‐like illness · general population
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.84, 1.09]9 studies · 276917 participantsModerate
Hand hygiene vs control
Laboratory‐confirmed influenza · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.63, 1.3]8 studies · 8332 participantsLow
Hand hygiene vs control
Composite of acute respiratory illness, influenza‐like illness, laboratory‐confirmed influenza · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.83, 0.94]19 studies · 71210 participantsLow
Hand hygiene vs control
Adverse events · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2 participantsVery low
Medical/surgical masks vs no masks
Viral respiratory illness ‐ laboratory‐confirmed influenza/SARS‐CoV‐2 · general population
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.72, 1.42]6 studies · 13919 participantsModerate
Medical/surgical masks vs no masks
Adverse events · general population
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 3 participantsVery low
N95 respirators vs medical/surgical masks
Viral respiratory illness ‐ clinical respiratory illness · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.45, 1.1]3 studies · 7799 participantsVery low
N95 respirators vs medical/surgical masks
Viral respiratory illness ‐ influenza‐like illness · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.66, 1.03]5 studies · 8407 participantsLow
N95 respirators vs medical/surgical masks
Viral respiratory illness ‐ laboratory‐confirmed influenza · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.1 [0.9, 1.34]5 studies · 8407 participantsModerate
N95 respirators vs medical/surgical masks
Adverse events · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 5 participantsVery low
Hand hygiene vs control
Acute respiratory illness · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.81, 0.9]9 studies · 52105 participantsModerate
Hand hygiene vs control
Influenza‐like illness · general population and healthcare workers
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.81, 1.09]11 studies · 34503 participantsLow
Nebulised hypertonic saline vs nebulised 0.9% saline
Length of hospital stay (days) Â · infants up to 24 months of age with acute bronchiolitis
Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted21 studies · 2479 participantsLow
Nebulised hypertonic saline vs nebulised 0.9% saline
Adverse events Assessed by investigators or reported by parents · infants up to 24 months of age with acute bronchiolitis
Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted27 studies · 4416 participantsLow
Nebulised hypertonic saline vs nebulised 0.9% saline
Clinical severity score (post‐treatment) at day 1 · infants up to 24 months of age with acute bronchiolitis
Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 893 participantsLow
Nebulised hypertonic saline vs nebulised 0.9% saline
Clinical severity score (post‐treatment) at day 2 · infants up to 24 months of age with acute bronchiolitis
Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 907 participantsLow