DMFT/DMFS index (dental caries experience) · Children aged 6 years and older (healthy except for dental caries)
In children aged 6 years and older, OHPPs showed no significant effect on DMFT/S (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.01; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Incremental cost‐effectiveness · Children with dental caries
OHPPs were associated with a lower program cost per DMFT/S in about 97 of 100 programs (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11; ungraded, very high heterogeneity I2=99%).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.03 [0.01, 0.11]
8 studies
GRADE not reported
DMFT/DMFS index (dental caries experience) · Children younger than 6 years (healthy except for dental caries)
In children younger than 6 years, OHPPs were associated with lower odds of DMFT/S (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.39; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Index test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
124 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Index Test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
4 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
648 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
347 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Index Test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
5 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
887 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
108 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Index Test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
4 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
951 participants
High