Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

157 questions · 161 findings · 19 reviews · Incontinence

No studies found 52 · 32.3%GRADE not reported 10 · 6.2%Very low 24 · 14.9%Low 36 · 22.4%Moderate 35 · 21.7%High 4 · 2.5%

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether single‐incision slings changes number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs injectable treatment

Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence ‐ urodynamic stress incontinence (only) · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether traditional suburethral sling operation changes repeat surgery for urinary incontinence ‐ urodynamic stress… compared with injectables (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs open abdominal retropubic suspension

Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence‐stress urinary incontinence (symptoms only) · women with urinary incontinence

Traditional suburethral sling operation leads to lower repeat surgery for urinary incontinence‐stress urinary incontinence… compared with open abdominal retropubic colposuspension (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review