Progression‐free survival (PSF) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4)assessed as: CTCAE v3.0 compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
1 finding from 1 review
Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
1 finding from 1 review
Progression‐free survival (PSF) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
Sunitinib may leads to higher progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
Sunitinib leads to higher overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
1 finding from 1 review
Progression‐free survival (PSF) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Sorafenib showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
It is very uncertain whether sorafenib changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
It is very uncertain whether sorafenib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life5 · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Pazopanib showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Pazopanib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Pazopanib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (mean change value) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
1 finding from 1 review