evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

25 questions · 25 findings · 6 reviews · Emergency and Critical Care

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1 · 4%GRADE not reported 2 · 8%Very low 8 · 32%Low 7 · 28%Moderate 7 · 28%High 0 · 0%

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Lung injury diagnosed after randomisation (composite outcome): range 4 d to 23 d · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes lung injury diagnosed after randomisation (composite outcome): range… compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Myocardial infarction · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes myocardial infarction diagnosed after randomisation: range ≤ 90 d compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Stroke · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes stroke diagnosed after randomisation: range 1 mo to 3 mo compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Higher vs lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation

Sepsis diagnosed after randomisation: range 28 d to 60 d · adults admitted to the ICU

It is very uncertain whether higher changes sepsis diagnosed after randomisation: range 28 d to 60 d compared with lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review