Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes admission to NICU compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oxytocin augmentation · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes oxytocin augmentation compared with vaginal dinoprostone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol probably leads to lower uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in apgar score less than seven at five minutes compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care unit compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with placebo/no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in vaginal birth within 24 hours compared with intravenous oxytocin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol probably leads to lower caesarean section compared with intravenous oxytocin (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with intravenous oxytocin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oxytocin augmentation · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower oxytocin augmentation compared with intravenous oxytocin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with intravenous oxytocin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with intravenous oxytocin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes admission to neonatal intensive care unit compared with intravenous oxytocin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in vaginal birth within 24 hours compared with mechanical methods (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower caesarean section compared with mechanical methods (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes compared with mechanical methods (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oxytocin augmentation · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol may leads to lower oxytocin augmentation compared with mechanical methods (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review