Differences in quality of life ( · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)
Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life (mean difference) at longest compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Has died · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)
Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care showed no clear difference in mortality: proportion of residents who died at longest compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Resource use: cost‐effectiveness evaluations (6 to 21 months) · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Medicine use · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Overall use of medicines · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Use of medicines for symptomatic conditions · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Use of medicines for asymptomatic conditions · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Cost · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Patient perspective · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Insurer perspective (expenditures on medicines) · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Insurer perspective (expenditures on health care) · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Healthcare utilisation · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Overall healthcare utilisation · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Emergency department and hospitalisation · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Outpatient care · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Health outcomes · vulnerable population: senior 65 years of age or older
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found