Intervention not reported
Adverse events · adults and children with focal seizures
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Lack of efficacy · adults and children with focal seizures
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Any reason · adults and children with focal seizures
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events · adults and children with focal seizures
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Lack of efficacy · adults and children with focal seizures
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Any reason · adults and children with generalised tonic‐clonic seizures with or without other seizure types
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events · adults and children with generalised tonic‐clonic seizures with or without other seizure types
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Lack of efficacy · adults and children with generalised tonic‐clonic seizures with or without other seizure types
1 finding from 1 review
Seizure freedom · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Withdrawals due to adverse events · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants seizure‐free at 24 months after randomization ‐ not reported · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events during treatment period · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants with treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) ‐ Leading to discontinuation during the treatment period № of participants: 36 (1 RCT) · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
It is very uncertain whether clonazepam changes proportion of participants with treatment‐emergent adverse events… compared with carbamazepine (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.61 [0.8, 8.52]
Studies not reported
Very low
Proportion of participants seizure‐free at 12 months after randomization · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion free from seizures (Engel Class 1) at 2 years · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events during treatment period · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Treatment withdrawal · people with epilepsy
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects (cardiac) · participants with epilepsy (BECTS)
Sulthiame showed no clear difference in adverse effects (cardiac) compared with levetiracetam (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review