Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

137 questions · 137 findings · 8 reviews · Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders

No studies found 46 · 33.6%GRADE not reported 3 · 2.2%Very low 21 · 15.3%Low 40 · 29.2%Moderate 21 · 15.3%High 6 · 4.4%

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs hydroxyurea and phlebotomy

Incidence of TIA · individuals with sickle cell disease who have had a stroke who have had long‐term red cell transfusions to prevent another stroke

It is very uncertain whether long‐term red cell transfusion changes incidence of TIA compared with hydroxyurea and phlebotomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs hydroxyurea and phlebotomy

Serious adverse events as a result of sickle cell‐related complications · individuals with sickle cell disease who have had a stroke who have had long‐term red cell transfusions to prevent another stroke

It is very uncertain whether long‐term red cell transfusion changes serious adverse events as a result of sickle cell‐related… compared with hydroxyurea and phlebotomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs hydroxyurea and phlebotomy

Measures of neurological impairment ‐ not reported · individuals with sickle cell disease who have had a stroke who have had long‐term red cell transfusions to prevent another stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs no transfusion

Adverse events associated with transfusion · individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell transfusions

It is very uncertain whether long‐term red cell transfusion changes adverse events associated with transfusion compared with no transfusion (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs no transfusion

TIA · individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell transfusions

It is very uncertain whether long‐term red cell transfusion changes TIA compared with no transfusion (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs no transfusion

Serious adverse events as a result of sickle cell‐related complications · individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have not had previous long‐term red cell transfusions

Long‐term red cell transfusion may leads to lower serious adverse events as a result of sickle cell‐related… compared with no transfusion (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs no transfusion

Stroke · individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have had long‐term red cell transfusions to prevent a stroke

It is very uncertain whether long‐term red cell transfusion changes clinical stroke compared with no transfusion (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs no transfusion

All‐cause mortality · individuals with sickle cell disease who are at risk of a primary stroke who have had long‐term red cell transfusions to prevent a stroke

It is very uncertain whether long‐term red cell transfusion changes all‐cause mortality compared with no transfusion (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs usual care

Proportion of participants developing new or progressive SCI lesions · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and normal TCD velocities

Long‐term RBC transfusion showed no clear difference in proportion of participants developing new or progressive SCI lesions compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Long‐term red cell transfusion vs usual care

SCD‐related SAEs ‐ pain crisis · prevention of SCI in people with SCD and abnormal TCD velocities

It is very uncertain whether long‐term RBC transfusion changes SCD‐related SAEs ‐ pain crisis compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review