What do systematic reviews say?

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs midurethral sling procedures

Laparoscopic colposuspension showed no clear difference in repeat continence surgery: compared with midurethral sling procedures (low certainty).

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.4 [0.04, 3.62]
  1 study · 70 participants
  Low

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs midurethral sling procedures

Laparoscopic colposuspension showed no clear difference in adverse effects: perioperative complications (number of events) compared with midurethral sling procedures (low certainty).

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.99 [0.6, 1.64]
  7 studies · 514 participants
  Low

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs midurethral sling procedures

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs midurethral sling procedures

Laparoscopic colposuspension showed no clear difference in adverse effects: de novo detrusor overactivity (urodynamic diagnosis) compared with midurethral sling procedures (low certainty).

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.8 [0.34, 1.88]
  4 studies · 326 participants
  Low

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs midurethral sling procedures

Laparoscopic colposuspension showed no clear difference in adverse effects: voiding dysfunction compared with midurethral sling procedures (moderate certainty).

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.06 [0.47, 2.41]
  5 studies · 412 participants
  Moderate

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs open colposuspension

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 742 participants
  GRADE not reported

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs open colposuspension

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 60 participants
  GRADE not reported

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs open colposuspension

Laparoscopic colposuspension may leads to lower adverse effects: perioperative complications (number of events) compared with open colposuspension (low certainty).

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.67 [0.47, 0.94]
  11 studies · 1369 participants
  Low

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs open colposuspension

Laparoscopic colposuspension showed no clear difference in adverse effects: bladder perforations compared with open colposuspension (moderate certainty).

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.72 [0.9, 3.29]
  10 studies · 1311 participants
  Moderate

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs open colposuspension

Laparoscopic colposuspension showed no clear difference in adverse effects: de novo detrusor overactivity (urodynamic diagnosis) compared with open colposuspension (moderate certainty).

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.29 [0.72, 2.3]
  5 studies · 472 participants
  Moderate

Laparoscopic colposuspension vs open colposuspension

Laparoscopic colposuspension showed no clear difference in adverse effects: voiding dysfunction compared with open colposuspension (moderate certainty).

• Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.81 [0.5, 1.31]
  5 studies · 507 participants
  Moderate

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with alternative approach (moderate certainty).

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.77 [0.26, 2.31]
  3 studies · 208 participants
  Moderate

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or more): Any recurrent prolapse compared with alternative approach (low certainty).

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.29 [0.64, 2.56]
  3 studies · 225 participants
  Low

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

It is very uncertain whether sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic changes any complications (Clavien‐Dindo > 3) compared with alternative approach (very low certainty).

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.26 [0.17, 9.44]
  2 studies · 193 participants
  Very low

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 241 participants
  Very low

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 246 participants
  Low

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs laparoscopic colposuspension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs laparoscopic colposuspension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs laparoscopic colposuspension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs laparoscopic colposuspension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found