evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

139 questions · 146 findings · 10 reviews · Neuromuscular

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 43 · 29.5%GRADE not reported 6 · 4.1%Very low 47 · 32.2%Low 29 · 19.9%Moderate 12 · 8.2%High 9 · 6.2%

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with relapsed or recurrent CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with relapsed or recurrent CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Foot alignment · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Foot alignmentPirani score. Scale from: 0 to 6. A lower score indicates better alignment · participants with CTEV at initial presentation
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function ‐ · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Foot alignment Pirani score. A lower score indicates better alignment. Scale from: 0 to 6. · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with CTEV at initial presentation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with CTEV at initial presentation
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with CTEV at initial presentation

The intervention may leads to lower adverse events (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review