Colorectal cancer risk (16 studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer
It is very uncertain whether highest changes colorectal cancer risk No. of participants: 712,746 (6 observational… compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Lung cancer risk (17 studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer
It is very uncertain whether highest changes lung cancer risk No. of participants: 371,067 (11 observational… compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Breast cancer risk (14 studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer
It is very uncertain whether highest changes breast cancer risk (women) No. of participants: 169,028 (8… compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 279,100 (5 observational studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer
It is very uncertain whether highest changes bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 279,100 (5 observational… compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prostate cancer risk (13 studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer
It is very uncertain whether highest changes prostate cancer risk No. of participants: 576,667 (21 observational… compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cancer mortality risk No. of participants: 17,448 (1 RCT) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in cancer mortality risk No. of participants: 17,448 (1 RCT) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Colorectal cancer risk (16 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in colorectal cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Non‐melanoma skin cancer risk No. of participants: 2027 (2 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in non‐melanoma skin cancer risk No. of participants: 2027 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Lung cancer risk (17 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in lung cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Breast cancer risk (14 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in breast cancer risk No. of participants: 802 (1 RCT) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prostate cancer risk (13 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in prostate cancer risk No. of participants: 18,942 (4 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Any cancer risk No. of participants: 76,239 (7 observational studies) · Participants in non experimental cohort studies on selenium and cancer
It is very uncertain whether highest changes any cancer risk No. of participants: 76,239 (7 observational studies) compared with lowest selenium exposure (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mean GI symptom scores (during RT) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer
Summary of findings: Higher bladder volume showed no clear difference in acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with lower bladder volume (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · newly‐diagnosed EOC
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Newly‐diagnosed EOC: PARPi monotherapy changes any severe adverse event (grade 3 or higher) (G3+ SevAE ) compared with placebo (maintenance therapy) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC
Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi… showed no clear difference in any severe adverse event (grade 3 or higher) (G3+ SevAE) compared with chemotherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC
Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi… may leads to higher any severe adverse event (grade 3 or higher) (G3+ SevAE) compared with placebo after chemotherapy (maintenance therapy) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review