Number of participants experiencing muscle‐related adverse events: e.g. soreness, discomfort, cramps, pain · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
It is very uncertain whether combinations of conservative treatments changes number of participants experiencing muscle‐related adverse events:… compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ PFMT + anal EStim + biofeedback versus no treatment · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
6295 participants
Low
FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
6004 participants
Moderate
*The anticipated absolute effects without exercise come from the range of outcomes at
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Men with UI after TURP
1 finding from 1 review
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · Men with UI after TURP
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events ‐ not reported · Men with UI after TURP
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · Men with UI after TURP
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment; (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Urinary Incontinence Score (ICI‐SF) ‐ after first year · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ FES versus ExMI · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
It is very uncertain whether treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment changes number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ FES versus ExMI compared with another active treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone compared with another active treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review