evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

60 questions · 60 findings · 7 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 17 · 28.3%GRADE not reported 13 · 21.7%Very low 19 · 31.7%Low 6 · 10%Moderate 5 · 8.3%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Uncemented first‐generation bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncemented first‐generation bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence,… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (3 RCTs; 485 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes cemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (3 RCTs; 485 participants)a (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented first‐generation unipolar hemiarthroplasty (1 RCT; 400 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncemented first‐generation unipolar hemiarthroplasty (1 RCT; 400… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented modern unipolar hemiarthroplasty (3 RCTs; 491 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncemented modern unipolar hemiarthroplasty (3 RCTs; 491… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented first‐generation bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

The intervention showed no clear difference in uncemented first‐generation bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

The intervention may leads to higher uncemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence,… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (6 RCTs; 771 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes cemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (6 RCTs; 771 participants)a (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented first‐generation unipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 RCTs; 668 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

The intervention showed no clear difference in uncemented first‐generation unipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 RCTs; 668… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented modern unipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 RCTs; 891 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncemented modern unipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 RCTs; 891… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bonded molar tubes (attached with adhesive) vs Molar bands (cemented, e.g. with glass ionomer cement)

Decalcification · Participants with full arch fixed orthodontic appliance(s) with molar tubes bonded to first or second permanent molars; excludes prior…

Bonded molar tubes (attached with adhesive) led to higher decalcification (participant level) compared with molar bands (cemented, e.g. with glass ionomer cement); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Bonded molar tubes (attached with adhesive) vs Molar bands (cemented, e.g. with glass ionomer cement)

First time failure at participant level · Participants with full arch fixed orthodontic appliance(s) with molar tubes bonded to first or second permanent molars; excludes prior…

Bonded molar tubes (attached with adhesive) led to higher first time failure at participant level compared with molar bands (cemented, e.g. with glass ionomer cement); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Bonded molar tubes (attached with adhesive) vs Molar bands (cemented, e.g. with glass ionomer cement)

First time failure at tooth level · Participants with full arch fixed orthodontic appliance(s) with molar tubes bonded to first or second permanent molars; excludes prior…

Bonded molar tubes (attached with adhesive) led to higher first time failure at tooth level compared with molar bands (cemented, e.g. with glass ionomer cement); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review