Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

64 questions · 67 findings · 8 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 10 · 14.9%GRADE not reported 3 · 4.5%Very low 20 · 29.9%Low 12 · 17.9%Moderate 13 · 19.4%High 9 · 13.4%

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Consistent application of condom by FSWs · sex workers

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in consistent application of condom by FSWs compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom showed no clear difference in HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review