Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease activity (skin softening) · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‐ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Primary outcome: Global improvement of disease activity or damage assessed by a medical practitioner or by participants · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events associated with treatment · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
Narrowband UVB phototherapy may leads to lower primary outcome: Adverse effects compared with low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease activity (skin softening) · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‐ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events associated with treatment · children and adolescents with active morphea (linear scleroderma, generalised morphea and mixed subtype: linear and circumscribed).
Oral methotrexate and oral prednisone showed no clear difference in primary outcome: Adverse effects compared with placebo and oral prednisone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease activity (reduction in lesion size) · children and adolescents with active morphea (linear scleroderma, generalised morphea and mixed subtype: linear and circumscribed).
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‐ not measured · children and adolescents with active morphea (linear scleroderma, generalised morphea and mixed subtype: linear and circumscribed).
1 finding from 1 review
Primary outcome: Global improvement of disease activity or damage assessed by a medical practitioner or by participants · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events associated with treatment · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
Medium‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (50 J/cm²) showed no clear difference in primary outcome: Adverse effects compared with low‐dose UVA‐1 phototherapy (20 J/cm²) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease activity (skin softening) · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: Improvement of disease damage ‐ not measured · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Primary outcome: Global improvement of disease activity or damage assessed by a medical practitioner or by participants · children and adults with active morphea (circumscribed morphea, linear scleroderma (with trunk/limb variant and head variant), generalised…
1 finding from 1 review
Participant‐reported scar improvement (long‐term) · people with acne scars
It is very uncertain whether chemical peeling changes participant‐reported scar improvement (long‐term) N of participants… compared with combined chemical peeling plus any active intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Investigator‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants with adverse events · people with acne scars
It is very uncertain whether chemical peeling changes participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants… compared with combined chemical peeling plus any active intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participant satisfaction · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review