Vaccine‐associated paralytic polio (VAPP) cases (Range of · preventing poliomyelitis
1 finding from 1 review
Neutralising antibodies · preventing poliomyelitis
1 finding from 1 review
Persons with faecal excretion after OPV challenge · preventing poliomyelitis
1 finding from 1 review
Vaccine‐associated paralytic polio (VAPP) cases (Range of · infants
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Low
Vaccination coverage · preventing poliomyelitis
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · preventing poliomyelitis
1 finding from 1 review
Neutralising antibodies with 2 IPV doses Geometric mean titres ( · infants
1 finding from 1 review
Persons with faecal polio excretion after OPV challenge (Range of · infants
IPV‐OPV showed no clear difference in persons with polio faecal excretion after OPV challenge (Range of compared with OPV (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vaccination coverage · infants
IPV‐OPV showed no clear difference in vaccination coverage ( compared with OPV (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.01 [0.96, 1.06]
1 participants
Low
Serious adverse events (classified by MedDRA) (Range of · infants
IPV‐OPV showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (classified by MedDRA) (Range of compared with OPV (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Paralytic wild polio cases at 4 years (Change level from IPV‐OPV to IPV) · infants
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Very low
Vaccine‐associated paralytic polio (VAPP) cases (Range of · infants
1 finding from 1 review
Pruritus · children with eczema
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Secondary outcome: clinical flare · adults with eczema
1 finding from 1 review
Pruritus · adults with eczema
1 finding from 1 review
Primary outcome 2. Proportion of participants reporting adverse effects and serious adverse events throughout the study period · adults with eczema
Fexofenadine 120 mg/d showed no clear difference in primary outcome 2. Proportion of participants reporting adverse… compared with placebo (1‐week intervention) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome 1. Mean change in physician‐assessed clinical signs This outcome was assessed as investigator‐assessed change in the ratio of pruritus area to body surface area · adults with eczema
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Moderate
Secondary outcome: quality of life · adults with eczema
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Secondary outcome 3. Number of eczema flares, measured by, for example, ‘escalation of treatment’ or ‘use of topical anti‐inflammatory medications’ Amount of 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate cream used during the study · adults with eczema
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Moderate
Pruritus · adults with eczema
1 finding from 1 review