Long (> 20 cm) vs short (≤ 20 cm) catheter
- Non‐pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 402 participantsLow
Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
It is very uncertain whether long (> 20 cm) changes death from any cause at day 28 of compared with short (≤ 20 cm) catheter (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether CVVHD changes death from any cause compared with CVVH or CVVHDF (very low certainty).
Long (> 20 cm) may leads to lower vascular access complications compared with short (≤ 20 cm) catheter (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether surface‐modified changes death from any cause at day 28 of compared with standard double‐lumen catheter with identical geometry and flow design (very low certainty).
Surface‐modified showed no clear difference in recovery of kidney function compared with standard double‐lumen catheter with identical geometry and flow design (low certainty).
Surface‐modified showed no clear difference in vascular access complications compared with standard double‐lumen catheter with identical geometry and flow design (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether CVVHD changes recovery of kidney function compared with CVVH or CVVHDF (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.