Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,345 questions · 4,525 findings · 483 reviews

No studies found 1,024 · 22.6%GRADE not reported 388 · 8.6%Very low 1,172 · 25.9%Low 1,227 · 27.1%Moderate 576 · 12.7%High 138 · 3%

Vaginal hysteropexy vs sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysteropexy vs sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

De novo dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) review 1 to 3 years · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ De novo dyspareunia compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysterectomy vs vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal procedure vs sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal vault prolapse

Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Bladder function ‐ Stress incontinence · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress urinary incontinence compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review