Intervention not reported
Postoperative mortality · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes postoperative mortality (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall postoperative morbidity · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes overall postoperative morbidity (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Reoperation rate · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes reoperation rate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events (diabetes mellitus) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative mortality · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes postoperative mortality (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Quality of life · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Cost‐effectiveness · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Total length of hospital stay (days) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall postoperative morbidity · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The intervention showed no clear difference in overall postoperative morbidity (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Reoperation rate · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The intervention may leads to lower reoperation rate (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cost‐effectiveness · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Total length of hospital stay (days) · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes total length of hospital stay (days) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative mortality · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes postoperative mortality (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Awareness of prolapse · women with apical vaginal vault prolapse
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or greater) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mesh exposure · women with apical uterine prolapse
It is very uncertain whether vaginal hysterectomy changes mesh exposure compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · women with apical uterine prolapse
1 finding from 1 review
Length of hospital stay · women with apical uterine prolapse
1 finding from 1 review