Intervention not reported
Quality of life · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Cost‐effectiveness · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Total length of hospital stay (days) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall postoperative morbidity · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The intervention showed no clear difference in overall postoperative morbidity (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Reoperation rate · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The intervention may leads to lower reoperation rate (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cost‐effectiveness · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Total length of hospital stay (days) · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes total length of hospital stay (days) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative mortality · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes postoperative mortality (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Recurrence of stroke · people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack
The intervention probably leads to lower recurrence of stroke (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Reported adverse events · people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack
The intervention showed no clear difference in reported adverse events (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious vascular events · people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack
The intervention may leads to lower serious vascular events (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Deaths due to vascular events · people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Disability due to vascular events · people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Improvement in quality of life · people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Insulin sensitivity · people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack
1 finding from 1 review
Cardiac T2* value · or population: people with transfusion‐dependent beta thalassaemia
1 finding from 1 review
MIC · or population: people with transfusion‐dependent beta thalassaemia
1 finding from 1 review
LVEF (echocardiography) · or population: people with transfusion‐dependent beta thalassaemia
1 finding from 1 review