evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,410 questions · 8,901 findings · 1,091 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1,687 · 19%GRADE not reported 1,469 · 16.5%Very low 1,969 · 22.1%Low 2,060 · 23.1%Moderate 1,302 · 14.6%High 414 · 4.7%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs conditional cash transfers: primary outcomes

Has had any illness in previous 2 weeks to 3 months · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: unconditional cash transfers changes has had any illness in previous 2 weeks to 3 months compared with conditional cash transfers: primary outcomes (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no unconditional cash transfer: primary outcomes

Is moderately stunted · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer changes is moderately stunted compared with no unconditional cash transfer: primary outcomes (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no unconditional cash transfer: primary outcomes

Has had any illness in previous 2 weeks to 3 months · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer probably leads to lower has had any illness in previous 2 weeks to 3 months compared with no unconditional cash transfer: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no unconditional cash transfer: primary outcomes

Has been food secure in previous month · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer may leads to higher has been food secure in previous month compared with no unconditional cash transfer: primary outcomes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no unconditional cash transfer: primary outcomes

Attends school · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer probably leads to higher attends school compared with no unconditional cash transfer: secondary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure

Live birth · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

Intentional endometrial injury showed no clear difference in live birth (primary analysis) compared with no intervention or a sham procedure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase (sensitivity analysis) · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review