Intervention not reported
Total length of hospital stay (days) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall postoperative morbidity · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The intervention showed no clear difference in overall postoperative morbidity (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Reoperation rate · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The intervention may leads to lower reoperation rate (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cost‐effectiveness · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Total length of hospital stay (days) · people undergoing distal pancreatectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes total length of hospital stay (days) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C) · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Postoperative mortality · people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes postoperative mortality (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vision‐related patient‐reported outcome measurement at 6 months (the greater the score, the better) · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical measures, such as reading speed or reading acuity at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Compliance · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Technical difficulties · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes technical difficulties with the intervention at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Device abandonment rate at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes device abandonment rate at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Glaucoma progression at 12 months, measured by additional visual field defects · people with primary angle‐closure suspect
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mean change in IOP measured in mmHg 12 months postintervention · people with primary angle‐closure suspect
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Gonioscopic findings · people with primary angle‐closure suspect
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Need for additional surgery: proportion of participants who received additional surgery to control IOP at 1 year · people with primary angle‐closure suspect
Iridotomy showed no clear difference in need for additional surgery: proportion of participants who received… compared with no iridotomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.5 [0.05, 5.5]
Studies not reported
Low
Mean number of antiglaucoma medications at 1‐year · people with primary angle‐closure suspect
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life measures · people with primary angle‐closure suspect
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · people with primary angle‐closure suspect
Iridotomy showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with no iridotomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 13.7 [0.73, 230.42]
Studies not reported
Low