Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,072 questions · 4,237 findings · 447 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 946 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 257 · 6.1%Very low 1,121 · 26.5%Low 1,207 · 28.5%Moderate 568 · 13.4%High 138 · 3.3%

Vaginal procedure vs sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal vault prolapse

Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Bladder function ‐ Stress incontinence · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress urinary incontinence compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures

Prolapse on examination ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Absorbable showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with non absorbable sutures (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or more): Any recurrent prolapse compared with alternative approach (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review