Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,072 questions · 4,237 findings · 447 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 946 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 257 · 6.1%Very low 1,121 · 26.5%Low 1,207 · 28.5%Moderate 568 · 13.4%High 138 · 3.3%

Vaginal hysterectomy vs sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or greater) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysteropexy vs sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysteropexy vs sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

De novo dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) review 1 to 3 years · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ De novo dyspareunia compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysterectomy vs vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review