Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

336 questions · 357 findings · 36 reviews

No studies found 65 · 18.2%GRADE not reported 16 · 4.5%Very low 87 · 24.4%Low 114 · 31.9%Moderate 60 · 16.8%High 15 · 4.2%

Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone

Time to progression · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer

Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α showed no clear difference in time‐to‐progression compared with intravesically administered BCG alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone

Discontinuation of medication due to adverse events · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer

Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α showed no clear difference in discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events compared with intravesically administered BCG alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone

Disease‐specific mortality ‐ not reported · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer

Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α showed no clear difference in disease‐specific mortality compared with intravesically administered BCG alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Variceal bleeding 5 years · patients with chronic hepatitis C who have failed prior antiviral therapy and who have severe histologic disease (grade 3 or 4 fibrosis)…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Ascites 5 years · patients with chronic hepatitis C who have failed prior antiviral therapy and who have severe histologic disease (grade 3 or 4 fibrosis)…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

First recurrence · high‐risk melanoma participants

The intervention leads to lower first recurrence (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Sustained (6 months) EDSS increase after 3 years · patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

The intervention showed no clear difference in sustained (6 months) EDSS increase after 3 years (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Sustained (3 months) EDSS increase after 3 years · patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

The intervention leads to lower sustained (3 months) EDSS increase after 3 years (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Sustained (3 or 6 months) EDSS increase at 3 years in patients with pre study relapses · patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

The intervention showed no clear difference in sustained (3 or 6 months) EDSS increase at 3 years in patients with… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Number of patients with at least one relapse during · patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

The intervention leads to lower number of patients with at least one relapse during (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patients with progression of the disease ( · patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

The intervention showed no clear difference in patients with progression of the disease ( (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patients with severe adverse event ( · patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

The intervention showed no clear difference in patients with severe adverse event ( (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patients with any related adverse event ( · patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

The intervention leads to higher patients with any related adverse event ( (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Sustained increase in spasticity ( · patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

The intervention showed no clear difference in sustained increase in spasticity ( (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review