Intervention not reported
Laquinimod (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3457 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
The intervention showed no clear difference in laquinimod (Direct evidence; 3 RCTs; 3457 participants) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Pegylated interferon beta‐1a (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1512 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes pegylated interferon beta‐1a (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1512… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Natalizumab (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 939 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
The intervention showed no clear difference in natalizumab (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 939 participants) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Ocrelizumab No direct evidence · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
The intervention showed no clear difference in ocrelizumab No direct evidence (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.82 [0.42, 1.6]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Ofatumumab No direct evidence · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
The intervention may leads to higher ofatumumab No direct evidence (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 2 [1.05, 3.81]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Ozanimod No direct evidence · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
The intervention showed no clear difference in ozanimod No direct evidence (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.01 [0.52, 1.95]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Ponesimod No direct evidence · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes ponesimod No direct evidence (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 5.04 [2.15, 11.82]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Teriflunomide (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2253 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
The intervention probably leads to higher teriflunomide (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2253 participants) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Placebo · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Disease activity · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
1 finding from 1 review
Disease activity · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
1 finding from 1 review
Maintenance of clinical remission · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
Anti‐TNF disease activity–guided dose tapering showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with persistent remission compared with anti‐TNF continuation (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants switched to another biologic due to loss of response · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
Anti‐TNF disease activity–guided dose tapering showed no clear difference in proportion of participants switched to another biologic due to loss… compared with anti‐TNF continuation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
Anti‐TNF disease activity–guided dose tapering showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression compared with anti‐TNF continuation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Function · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
1 finding from 1 review
Maintenance of clinical remission · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
Anti‐TNF dose reduction showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with persistent remission compared with anti‐TNF continuation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of serious adverse events · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
It is very uncertain whether anti‐TNF disease activity–guided dose tapering changes number of serious adverse events compared with anti‐TNF continuation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events not measured · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants switched to another biologic · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
Anti‐TNF dose reduction may leads to lower proportion of participants switched to another biologic compared with anti‐TNF continuation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
Anti‐TNF dose reduction showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression compared with anti‐TNF continuation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review