Relapse ‐ not reported · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Leaving the study early ‐ short term ‐ due to lack of efficacy · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes leaving the study early ‐ inefficacy ‐ short term (up to 12 weeks) compared with QUETIAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cost‐effectiveness · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Clinically important response (defined by study) ‐ short term (up to 12 weeks) decreased rate of PANSS score < 40%, decreased rate of BPRS score < 40% · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes clinically important response (defined by study) ‐ short term (up to… compared with OLANZAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Relapse ‐ not reported · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Clinically important change in life skills (long term) ‐ not reported · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life (long term) ‐ not reported · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects: 2. Extrapyramidal ‐ akathisia · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes adverse effects: Extrapyramidal effects ‐ akathisia ‐ short term (up… compared with OLANZAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early ‐ short term ‐ due to lack of efficacy · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes leaving the study early: inefficacy ‐ short term (up to 12 weeks) compared with OLANZAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cost‐effectiveness (long term) ‐ not reported · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Clinically important change in life skills (long term) ‐ not reported · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life (long term) ‐ not measured · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects: Extrapyramidal effects ‐ concomitant anticholinergic medication ‐ short term (up to 12 weeks) Participants requiring concomitant anticholinergic medication · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes adverse effects: Extrapyramidal effects ‐ concomitant… compared with AMISULPRIDE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Behaviour: Leaving the study early (short‐term) · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes leaving the study early ‐ any reason ‐ short term (up to 12 weeks) compared with AMISULPRIDE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cost‐effectiveness · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Clinically important response (defined by study) ‐ short term (up to 12 weeks) decreased rate of BPRS score < 20% · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes clinically important response (defined by study) ‐ short term (up to… compared with RISPERIDONE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Relapse ‐ not reported · patients with schizophrenia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Global state: No clinically important response (as defined by the original studies) · patients with schizophrenia
COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE showed no clear difference in global state: No clinically significant response compared with CLOZAPINE (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early · patients with schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether COMPARISON 2. ARIPIPRAZOLE changes leaving the study early compared with QUETIAPINE (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · patients with schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review