Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,447 questions · 2,590 findings · 266 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 699 · 27%GRADE not reported 289 · 11.2%Very low 614 · 23.7%Low 605 · 23.4%Moderate 322 · 12.4%High 61 · 2.4%

Active information provision vs control

Knowledge of stroke and stroke services · stroke carers

1 finding from 1 review

Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 356 participants
Very low

Active self-ligating brackets vs Passive self-ligating brackets

Time to alignment · Children or adolescents (aged 16 years old or under) receiving orthodontic treatment to prevent or correct crowded teeth

Active self-ligating brackets showed no clear difference in time to alignment (days) compared with passive self-ligating brackets; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
alignment
MD -13.11 [-28.76, 2.53]
2 studies · 144 participants
GRADE not reported

Active self-ligating brackets vs Passive self-ligating brackets

Amount of crowding (upper anterior crowding) · Children or adolescents (aged 16 years old or under) receiving orthodontic treatment to prevent or correct crowded teeth

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
baseline
Only baseline upper anterior crowding reported (Pandis 2010a, n=70); evidence of baseline imbalance between groups (P=0.04); no post-treatment between-group crowding estimate reported.
1 study
GRADE not reported

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

Decisional conflict · adult participants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

Moral distress · adult participants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

Patient involvement in decision‐making · adult participants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life · adult participants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

Ethical competency · adult participants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Proactive ethics consultation vs usual care

Satisfaction with care · adult participants

1 finding from 1 review

Ethical case interventions for adult patients 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
478 participants
Very low

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation

Activities of daily living · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Low

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation

Upper limb function · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Low

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation

Lower limb function · people with stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation

Spasticity (elbow) · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Low

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation

Spasticity (wrist) · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Low

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation

Muscle strength · people with stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation

Death · people with stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only

Activities of daily living · people with stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only

Upper limb function · people with stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only

Lower limb function · people with stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only

Spasticity (elbow) · people with stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found