Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,815 questions · 6,211 findings · 638 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 1,052 · 16.9%GRADE not reported 441 · 7.1%Very low 1,700 · 27.4%Low 1,651 · 26.6%Moderate 1,070 · 17.2%High 297 · 4.8%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Routine vaginal examination vs routine rectal examination

Augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: (0 studies) · pregnant women in labour at term

It is very uncertain whether routine vaginal examination changes augmentation of labour (primary outcome)№ of participants: 307(1 RCT) compared with routine rectal examination (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase (sensitivity analysis) · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review