Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

303 questions · 321 findings · 26 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 64 · 19.9%GRADE not reported 3 · 0.9%Very low 67 · 20.9%Low 104 · 32.4%Moderate 77 · 24%High 6 · 1.9%

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs biological graft

Painful intercourse ‐ Dyspareunia · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in dyspareunia (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.87 [0.39, 1.93]
2 studies · 151 participants
Low

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs polypropylene mesh

Awareness of prolapse · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.77 [1.37, 2.28]
9 studies · 1133 participants
Moderate

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs polypropylene mesh

Recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (1‐3 years) · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue may leads to higher recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.01 [2.52, 3.6]
16 studies · 1976 participants
Low